Initialization Order of Class Data Members

Solution 1:

The order is the order they appear in the class definition - this is from section 12.6.2 of the C++ Standard:

5 Initialization shall proceed in the following order:

— First, and only for the constructor of the most derived class as described below, virtual base classes shall be initialized in the order they appear on a depth-first left-to-right traversal of the directed acyclic graph of base classes, where “left-to-right” is the order of appearance of the base class names in the derived class base-specifier-list.

— Then, direct base classes shall be initialized in declaration order as they appear in the base-specifier-list (regardless of the order of the mem-initializers).

— Then, nonstatic data members shall be initialized in the order they were declared in the class definition (again regardless of the order of the mem-initializers).

— Finally, the body of the constructor is executed. [Note: the declaration order is mandated to ensure that base and member subobjects are destroyed in the reverse order of initialization. ]

Solution 2:

Initialization is always in the order that the class members appear in your class definition, so in your example a, then b.

There is a sequence point between the initialization of each member and you can pass a reference to a yet-to-be initialized member into the constructor of a class member but you would only be able to use it in limited ways (such as taking its address to form a pointer), other uses may well cause undefined behaviour.

Destruction of class members always happens in the reverse order of construction.

Order of initialization of bases and members is defined in 12.6.2 [class.base.init]/5.