Why "explicit lifetime bound required" for Box<T> in struct?

Editor's note: This code no longer produces the same error after RFC 599 was implemented, but the concepts discussed in the answers are still valid.

I'm trying to compile this code:

trait A {
    fn f(&self);
}

struct S {
    a: Box<A>,
}

and I'm getting this error:

a.rs:6:13: 6:14 error: explicit lifetime bound required
a.rs:6     a: Box<A>,

I want S.a to own an instance of A, and don't see how that lifetime is appropriate here. What do I need to do to make the compiler happy?

My Rust version:

rustc --version
rustc 0.12.0-pre-nightly (79a5448f4 2014-09-13 20:36:02 +0000)

(Slightly pedantic point: that A is a trait, so S is not owning an instance of A, it is owning an boxed instance of some type that implements A.)

A trait object represents data with some unknown type, that is, the only thing known about the data is that it implements the trait A. Because the type is not known, the compiler cannot directly reason about the lifetime of the contained data, and so requires that this information is explicitly stated in the trait object type.

This is done via Trait+'lifetime. The easiest route is to just use 'static, that is, completely disallow storing data that can become invalid due to scopes:

a: Box<A + 'static>

Previously, (before the possibility of lifetime-bounded trait objects and this explicit lifetime bound required error message was introduced) all boxed trait objects were implicitly 'static, that is, this restricted form was the only choice.

The most flexible form is exposing the lifetime externally:

struct S<'x> {
    a: Box<A + 'x>
}

This allows S to store a trait object of any type that implements A, possibly with some restrictions on the scopes in which the S is valid (i.e. for types for which 'x is less than 'static the S object will be trapped within some stack frame).

The problem here is that a trait can be implemented for references too, so if you don't specify the required lifetime for Box anything could be stored in there.

You can see about lifetime requirements in this rfc.

So one possible solution is to bind the lifetime so Send (we put I in S):

trait A {
    fn f(&self);
}

struct I;

impl A for I {
    fn f(&self) {
        println!("A for I")
    }
}

struct S {
    a: Box<A + Send>
}

fn main() {
    let s = S {
        a: box I
    };
    s.a.f();
}

The other is setting the lifetime to 'a (we can put a reference &I or I to S):

trait A {
    fn f(&self);
}

struct I;

impl A for I {
    fn f(&self) {
        println!("A for I")
    }
}

impl <'a> A for &'a I {
    fn f(&self) {
        println!("A for &I")
    }
}

struct S<'a> {
    a: Box<A + 'a>
}

fn main() {
    let s = S {
        a: box &I
    };
    s.a.f();
}

Note that this is more general and we can store both references and owned data (Send kind that has a lifetime of 'static) but you require a lifetime parameter everywhere the type is used.

Why "explicit lifetime bound required" for Box<T> in struct?

Related

Recent Posts