Passing multiple parameters to pool.map() function in Python [duplicate]
Solution 1:
You can use functools.partial
for this (as you suspected):
from functools import partial
def target(lock, iterable_item):
for item in iterable_item:
# Do cool stuff
if (... some condition here ...):
lock.acquire()
# Write to stdout or logfile, etc.
lock.release()
def main():
iterable = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
pool = multiprocessing.Pool()
l = multiprocessing.Lock()
func = partial(target, l)
pool.map(func, iterable)
pool.close()
pool.join()
Example:
def f(a, b, c):
print("{} {} {}".format(a, b, c))
def main():
iterable = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
pool = multiprocessing.Pool()
a = "hi"
b = "there"
func = partial(f, a, b)
pool.map(func, iterable)
pool.close()
pool.join()
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
Output:
hi there 1
hi there 2
hi there 3
hi there 4
hi there 5
Solution 2:
You could use a map function that allows multiple arguments, as does the fork of multiprocessing
found in pathos
.
>>> from pathos.multiprocessing import ProcessingPool as Pool
>>>
>>> def add_and_subtract(x,y):
... return x+y, x-y
...
>>> res = Pool().map(add_and_subtract, range(0,20,2), range(-5,5,1))
>>> res
[(-5, 5), (-2, 6), (1, 7), (4, 8), (7, 9), (10, 10), (13, 11), (16, 12), (19, 13), (22, 14)]
>>> Pool().map(add_and_subtract, *zip(*res))
[(0, -10), (4, -8), (8, -6), (12, -4), (16, -2), (20, 0), (24, 2), (28, 4), (32, 6), (36, 8)]
pathos
enables you to easily nest hierarchical parallel maps with multiple inputs, so we can extend our example to demonstrate that.
>>> from pathos.multiprocessing import ThreadingPool as TPool
>>>
>>> res = TPool().amap(add_and_subtract, *zip(*Pool().map(add_and_subtract, range(0,20,2), range(-5,5,1))))
>>> res.get()
[(0, -10), (4, -8), (8, -6), (12, -4), (16, -2), (20, 0), (24, 2), (28, 4), (32, 6), (36, 8)]
Even more fun, is to build a nested function that we can pass into the Pool.
This is possible because pathos
uses dill
, which can serialize almost anything in python.
>>> def build_fun_things(f, g):
... def do_fun_things(x, y):
... return f(x,y), g(x,y)
... return do_fun_things
...
>>> def add(x,y):
... return x+y
...
>>> def sub(x,y):
... return x-y
...
>>> neato = build_fun_things(add, sub)
>>>
>>> res = TPool().imap(neato, *zip(*Pool().map(neato, range(0,20,2), range(-5,5,1))))
>>> list(res)
[(0, -10), (4, -8), (8, -6), (12, -4), (16, -2), (20, 0), (24, 2), (28, 4), (32, 6), (36, 8)]
If you are not able to go outside of the standard library, however, you will have to do this another way. Your best bet in that case is to use multiprocessing.starmap
as seen here: Python multiprocessing pool.map for multiple arguments (noted by @Roberto in the comments on the OP's post)
Get pathos
here: https://github.com/uqfoundation
Solution 3:
In case you don't have access to functools.partial
, you could use a wrapper function for this, as well.
def target(lock):
def wrapped_func(items):
for item in items:
# Do cool stuff
if (... some condition here ...):
lock.acquire()
# Write to stdout or logfile, etc.
lock.release()
return wrapped_func
def main():
iterable = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
pool = multiprocessing.Pool()
lck = multiprocessing.Lock()
pool.map(target(lck), iterable)
pool.close()
pool.join()
This makes target()
into a function that accepts a lock (or whatever parameters you want to give), and it will return a function that only takes in an iterable as input, but can still use all your other parameters. That's what is ultimately passed in to pool.map()
, which then should execute with no problems.