Why are Docker container images so large?

I made a simple image through Dockerfile from Fedora (initially 320 MB).

Added Nano (this tiny editor of 1MB size), and the size of the image has risen to 530 MB. I've added Git on top of that (30-ish MB), and then my image size sky-rockets to 830 MB.

Isn't that insane?

I've tried to export and import container to remove history/intermediate images. This effort saved up to 25 MB, now my image size is 804 MB. I've also tried to run many commands on one RUN, but still I'm getting the same initial 830MB.

I'm having my doubts if it is worth to use Docker at all. I mean, I barely installed anything and I'm hitting 1GB over. If I will have to add some serious stuff like a database and so on I might run out of disk space.

Anyone suffers from ridiculous size of images? How do you deal with it?

Unless my Dockerfile is horribly incorrect?

FROM fedora:latest
MAINTAINER Me NotYou <[email protected]>
RUN yum -y install nano
RUN yum -y install git

but it's hard to imagine what could go wrong in here.

Solution 1:

As @rexposadas said, images include all the layers and each layer includes all the dependencies for what you installed. It is also important to note that the base images (like fedora:latest tend to be very bare-bones. You may be surprised by the number of dependencies your installed software has.

I was able to make your installation significantly smaller by adding yum -y clean all to each line:

FROM fedora:latest
RUN yum -y install nano && yum -y clean all
RUN yum -y install git && yum -y clean all

It is important to do that for each RUN, before the layer gets committed, or else deletes don't actually remove data. That is, in a union/copy-on-write file system, cleaning at the end doesn't really reduce file system usage because the real data is already committed to lower layers. To get around this you must clean at each layer.

$ docker history bf5260c6651d
IMAGE               CREATED             CREATED BY                                      SIZE
bf5260c6651d        4 days ago          /bin/sh -c yum -y install git; yum -y clean a   260.7 MB
172743bd5d60        4 days ago          /bin/sh -c yum -y install nano; yum -y clean    12.39 MB
3f2fed40e4b0        2 weeks ago         /bin/sh -c #(nop) ADD file:cee1a4fcfcd00d18da   372.7 MB
fd241224e9cf        2 weeks ago         /bin/sh -c #(nop) MAINTAINER Lokesh Mandvekar   0 B
511136ea3c5a        12 months ago                                                       0 B

Solution 2:

Docker images are not large, you are just building large images.

The scratch image is 0B and you can use that to package up your code if you can compile your code into a static binary. For example, you can compile your Go program and package it on top of scratch to make a fully usable image that is less than 5MB.

The key is to not use the official Docker images, they are too big. Scratch isn't all that practical either so I'd recommend using Alpine Linux as your base image. It is ~5MB, then only add what is required for your app. This post about Microcontainers shows you how to build very small images base on Alpine.

UPDATE: the official Docker images are based on alpine now so they are good to use now.

Solution 3:

Here are some more things you can do:

• Avoid multiple RUN commands where you can. Put as much as possbile into one RUN command (using &&)
• clean-up unnecessary tools like wget or git (which you only need for download or building stuff, but not to run your process)

With these both AND the recommendations from @Andy and @michau I was able to resize my nodejs image from 1.062 GB to 542 MB.

Edit: One more important thing: "It took me a while to really understand that each Dockerfile command creates a new container with the deltas. [...] It doesn't matter if you rm -rf the files in a later command; they continue exist in some intermediate layer container." So now I managed to put apt-get install, wget, npm install (with git dependencies) and apt-get remove into a single RUN command, so now my image has only 438 MB.

Edit 29/06/17

With Docker v17.06 there comes a new features for Dockerfiles: You can have multiple FROM statements inside one Dockerfile and only the stuff from last FROM will be in your final Docker image. This is useful to reduce image size, for example:

FROM nodejs as builder
WORKDIR /var/my-project
RUN apt-get install ruby python git openssh gcc && \
    git clone my-project . && \
    npm install

FROM nodejs
COPY --from=builder /var/my-project /var/my-project

Will result in an image having only the nodejs base image plus the content from /var/my-project from the first steps - but without the ruby, python, git, openssh and gcc!

Solution 4:

Yes, those sizes are ridiculous, and I really have no idea why so few people notice that.

I made an Ubuntu image that is actually minimal (unlike other so-called "minimal" images). It's called textlab/ubuntu-essential and has 60 MB.

FROM textlab/ubuntu-essential
RUN apt-get update && apt-get -y install nano

The above image is 82 MB after installing nano.

FROM textlab/ubuntu-essential
RUN apt-get update && apt-get -y install nano git

Git has many more prerequisites, so the image gets larger, about 192 MB. That's still less that the initial size of most images.

You can also take a look at the script I wrote to make the minimal Ubuntu image for Docker. You can perhaps adapt it to Fedora, but I'm not sure how much you will be able to uninstall.