Difference between using Throwable and Exception in a try catch
Solution 1:
By catching Throwable
it includes things that subclass Error
. You should generally not do that, except perhaps at the very highest "catch all" level of a thread where you want to log or otherwise handle absolutely everything that can go wrong. It would be more typical in a framework type application (for example an application server or a testing framework) where it can be running unknown code and should not be affected by anything that goes wrong with that code, as much as possible.
Solution 2:
The first one catches all subclasses of Throwable
(this includes Exception
and Error
), the second one catches all subclasses of Exception
.
Error
is programmatically unrecoverable in any way and is usually not to be caught, except for logging purposes (which passes it through again). Exception
is programmatically recoverable. Its subclass RuntimeException
indicates a programming error and is usually not to be caught as well.
Solution 3:
Throwable
is super class of Exception
as well as Error
. In normal cases we should always catch sub-classes of Exception
, so that the root cause doesn't get lost.
Only special cases where you see possibility of things going wrong which is not in control of your Java code, you should catch Error
or Throwable
.
I remember catching Throwable to flag that a native library is not loaded.