How to detect a Christmas Tree?
Which image processing techniques could be used to implement an application that detects the Christmas trees displayed in the following images?
I'm searching for solutions that are going to work on all these images. Therefore, approaches that require training haar cascade classifiers or template matching are not very interesting.
I'm looking for something that can be written in any programming language, as long as it uses only Open Source technologies. The solution must be tested with the images that are shared on this question. There are 6 input images and the answer should display the results of processing each of them. Finally, for each output image there must be red lines draw to surround the detected tree.
How would you go about programmatically detecting the trees in these images?
I have an approach which I think is interesting and a bit different from the rest. The main difference in my approach, compared to some of the others, is in how the image segmentation step is performed--I used the DBSCAN clustering algorithm from Python's scikit-learn; it's optimized for finding somewhat amorphous shapes that may not necessarily have a single clear centroid.
At the top level, my approach is fairly simple and can be broken down into about 3 steps. First I apply a threshold (or actually, the logical "or" of two separate and distinct thresholds). As with many of the other answers, I assumed that the Christmas tree would be one of the brighter objects in the scene, so the first threshold is just a simple monochrome brightness test; any pixels with values above 220 on a 0-255 scale (where black is 0 and white is 255) are saved to a binary black-and-white image. The second threshold tries to look for red and yellow lights, which are particularly prominent in the trees in the upper left and lower right of the six images, and stand out well against the blue-green background which is prevalent in most of the photos. I convert the rgb image to hsv space, and require that the hue is either less than 0.2 on a 0.0-1.0 scale (corresponding roughly to the border between yellow and green) or greater than 0.95 (corresponding to the border between purple and red) and additionally I require bright, saturated colors: saturation and value must both be above 0.7. The results of the two threshold procedures are logically "or"-ed together, and the resulting matrix of black-and-white binary images is shown below:
You can clearly see that each image has one large cluster of pixels roughly corresponding to the location of each tree, plus a few of the images also have some other small clusters corresponding either to lights in the windows of some of the buildings, or to a background scene on the horizon. The next step is to get the computer to recognize that these are separate clusters, and label each pixel correctly with a cluster membership ID number.
For this task I chose DBSCAN. There is a pretty good visual comparison of how DBSCAN typically behaves, relative to other clustering algorithms, available here. As I said earlier, it does well with amorphous shapes. The output of DBSCAN, with each cluster plotted in a different color, is shown here:
There are a few things to be aware of when looking at this result. First is that DBSCAN requires the user to set a "proximity" parameter in order to regulate its behavior, which effectively controls how separated a pair of points must be in order for the algorithm to declare a new separate cluster rather than agglomerating a test point onto an already pre-existing cluster. I set this value to be 0.04 times the size along the diagonal of each image. Since the images vary in size from roughly VGA up to about HD 1080, this type of scale-relative definition is critical.
Another point worth noting is that the DBSCAN algorithm as it is implemented in scikit-learn has memory limits which are fairly challenging for some of the larger images in this sample. Therefore, for a few of the larger images, I actually had to "decimate" (i.e., retain only every 3rd or 4th pixel and drop the others) each cluster in order to stay within this limit. As a result of this culling process, the remaining individual sparse pixels are difficult to see on some of the larger images. Therefore, for display purposes only, the color-coded pixels in the above images have been effectively "dilated" just slightly so that they stand out better. It's purely a cosmetic operation for the sake of the narrative; although there are comments mentioning this dilation in my code, rest assured that it has nothing to do with any calculations that actually matter.
Once the clusters are identified and labeled, the third and final step is easy: I simply take the largest cluster in each image (in this case, I chose to measure "size" in terms of the total number of member pixels, although one could have just as easily instead used some type of metric that gauges physical extent) and compute the convex hull for that cluster. The convex hull then becomes the tree border. The six convex hulls computed via this method are shown below in red:
The source code is written for Python 2.7.6 and it depends on numpy, scipy, matplotlib and scikit-learn. I've divided it into two parts. The first part is responsible for the actual image processing:
from PIL import Image
import numpy as np
import scipy as sp
import matplotlib.colors as colors
from sklearn.cluster import DBSCAN
from math import ceil, sqrt
"""
Inputs:
rgbimg: [M,N,3] numpy array containing (uint, 0-255) color image
hueleftthr: Scalar constant to select maximum allowed hue in the
yellow-green region
huerightthr: Scalar constant to select minimum allowed hue in the
blue-purple region
satthr: Scalar constant to select minimum allowed saturation
valthr: Scalar constant to select minimum allowed value
monothr: Scalar constant to select minimum allowed monochrome
brightness
maxpoints: Scalar constant maximum number of pixels to forward to
the DBSCAN clustering algorithm
proxthresh: Proximity threshold to use for DBSCAN, as a fraction of
the diagonal size of the image
Outputs:
borderseg: [K,2,2] Nested list containing K pairs of x- and y- pixel
values for drawing the tree border
X: [P,2] List of pixels that passed the threshold step
labels: [Q,2] List of cluster labels for points in Xslice (see
below)
Xslice: [Q,2] Reduced list of pixels to be passed to DBSCAN
"""
def findtree(rgbimg, hueleftthr=0.2, huerightthr=0.95, satthr=0.7,
valthr=0.7, monothr=220, maxpoints=5000, proxthresh=0.04):
# Convert rgb image to monochrome for
gryimg = np.asarray(Image.fromarray(rgbimg).convert('L'))
# Convert rgb image (uint, 0-255) to hsv (float, 0.0-1.0)
hsvimg = colors.rgb_to_hsv(rgbimg.astype(float)/255)
# Initialize binary thresholded image
binimg = np.zeros((rgbimg.shape[0], rgbimg.shape[1]))
# Find pixels with hue<0.2 or hue>0.95 (red or yellow) and saturation/value
# both greater than 0.7 (saturated and bright)--tends to coincide with
# ornamental lights on trees in some of the images
boolidx = np.logical_and(
np.logical_and(
np.logical_or((hsvimg[:,:,0] < hueleftthr),
(hsvimg[:,:,0] > huerightthr)),
(hsvimg[:,:,1] > satthr)),
(hsvimg[:,:,2] > valthr))
# Find pixels that meet hsv criterion
binimg[np.where(boolidx)] = 255
# Add pixels that meet grayscale brightness criterion
binimg[np.where(gryimg > monothr)] = 255
# Prepare thresholded points for DBSCAN clustering algorithm
X = np.transpose(np.where(binimg == 255))
Xslice = X
nsample = len(Xslice)
if nsample > maxpoints:
# Make sure number of points does not exceed DBSCAN maximum capacity
Xslice = X[range(0,nsample,int(ceil(float(nsample)/maxpoints)))]
# Translate DBSCAN proximity threshold to units of pixels and run DBSCAN
pixproxthr = proxthresh * sqrt(binimg.shape[0]**2 + binimg.shape[1]**2)
db = DBSCAN(eps=pixproxthr, min_samples=10).fit(Xslice)
labels = db.labels_.astype(int)
# Find the largest cluster (i.e., with most points) and obtain convex hull
unique_labels = set(labels)
maxclustpt = 0
for k in unique_labels:
class_members = [index[0] for index in np.argwhere(labels == k)]
if len(class_members) > maxclustpt:
points = Xslice[class_members]
hull = sp.spatial.ConvexHull(points)
maxclustpt = len(class_members)
borderseg = [[points[simplex,0], points[simplex,1]] for simplex
in hull.simplices]
return borderseg, X, labels, Xslice
and the second part is a user-level script which calls the first file and generates all of the plots above:
#!/usr/bin/env python
from PIL import Image
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import matplotlib.cm as cm
from findtree import findtree
# Image files to process
fname = ['nmzwj.png', 'aVZhC.png', '2K9EF.png',
'YowlH.png', '2y4o5.png', 'FWhSP.png']
# Initialize figures
fgsz = (16,7)
figthresh = plt.figure(figsize=fgsz, facecolor='w')
figclust = plt.figure(figsize=fgsz, facecolor='w')
figcltwo = plt.figure(figsize=fgsz, facecolor='w')
figborder = plt.figure(figsize=fgsz, facecolor='w')
figthresh.canvas.set_window_title('Thresholded HSV and Monochrome Brightness')
figclust.canvas.set_window_title('DBSCAN Clusters (Raw Pixel Output)')
figcltwo.canvas.set_window_title('DBSCAN Clusters (Slightly Dilated for Display)')
figborder.canvas.set_window_title('Trees with Borders')
for ii, name in zip(range(len(fname)), fname):
# Open the file and convert to rgb image
rgbimg = np.asarray(Image.open(name))
# Get the tree borders as well as a bunch of other intermediate values
# that will be used to illustrate how the algorithm works
borderseg, X, labels, Xslice = findtree(rgbimg)
# Display thresholded images
axthresh = figthresh.add_subplot(2,3,ii+1)
axthresh.set_xticks([])
axthresh.set_yticks([])
binimg = np.zeros((rgbimg.shape[0], rgbimg.shape[1]))
for v, h in X:
binimg[v,h] = 255
axthresh.imshow(binimg, interpolation='nearest', cmap='Greys')
# Display color-coded clusters
axclust = figclust.add_subplot(2,3,ii+1) # Raw version
axclust.set_xticks([])
axclust.set_yticks([])
axcltwo = figcltwo.add_subplot(2,3,ii+1) # Dilated slightly for display only
axcltwo.set_xticks([])
axcltwo.set_yticks([])
axcltwo.imshow(binimg, interpolation='nearest', cmap='Greys')
clustimg = np.ones(rgbimg.shape)
unique_labels = set(labels)
# Generate a unique color for each cluster
plcol = cm.rainbow_r(np.linspace(0, 1, len(unique_labels)))
for lbl, pix in zip(labels, Xslice):
for col, unqlbl in zip(plcol, unique_labels):
if lbl == unqlbl:
# Cluster label of -1 indicates no cluster membership;
# override default color with black
if lbl == -1:
col = [0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 1.0]
# Raw version
for ij in range(3):
clustimg[pix[0],pix[1],ij] = col[ij]
# Dilated just for display
axcltwo.plot(pix[1], pix[0], 'o', markerfacecolor=col,
markersize=1, markeredgecolor=col)
axclust.imshow(clustimg)
axcltwo.set_xlim(0, binimg.shape[1]-1)
axcltwo.set_ylim(binimg.shape[0], -1)
# Plot original images with read borders around the trees
axborder = figborder.add_subplot(2,3,ii+1)
axborder.set_axis_off()
axborder.imshow(rgbimg, interpolation='nearest')
for vseg, hseg in borderseg:
axborder.plot(hseg, vseg, 'r-', lw=3)
axborder.set_xlim(0, binimg.shape[1]-1)
axborder.set_ylim(binimg.shape[0], -1)
plt.show()
EDIT NOTE: I edited this post to (i) process each tree image individually, as requested in the requirements, (ii) to consider both object brightness and shape in order to improve the quality of the result.
Below is presented an approach that takes in consideration the object brightness and shape. In other words, it seeks for objects with triangle-like shape and with significant brightness. It was implemented in Java, using Marvin image processing framework.
The first step is the color thresholding. The objective here is to focus the analysis on objects with significant brightness.
output images:
source code:
public class ChristmasTree {
private MarvinImagePlugin fill = MarvinPluginLoader.loadImagePlugin("org.marvinproject.image.fill.boundaryFill");
private MarvinImagePlugin threshold = MarvinPluginLoader.loadImagePlugin("org.marvinproject.image.color.thresholding");
private MarvinImagePlugin invert = MarvinPluginLoader.loadImagePlugin("org.marvinproject.image.color.invert");
private MarvinImagePlugin dilation = MarvinPluginLoader.loadImagePlugin("org.marvinproject.image.morphological.dilation");
public ChristmasTree(){
MarvinImage tree;
// Iterate each image
for(int i=1; i<=6; i++){
tree = MarvinImageIO.loadImage("./res/trees/tree"+i+".png");
// 1. Threshold
threshold.setAttribute("threshold", 200);
threshold.process(tree.clone(), tree);
}
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
new ChristmasTree();
}
}
In the second step, the brightest points in the image are dilated in order to form shapes. The result of this process is the probable shape of the objects with significant brightness. Applying flood fill segmentation, disconnected shapes are detected.
output images:
source code:
public class ChristmasTree {
private MarvinImagePlugin fill = MarvinPluginLoader.loadImagePlugin("org.marvinproject.image.fill.boundaryFill");
private MarvinImagePlugin threshold = MarvinPluginLoader.loadImagePlugin("org.marvinproject.image.color.thresholding");
private MarvinImagePlugin invert = MarvinPluginLoader.loadImagePlugin("org.marvinproject.image.color.invert");
private MarvinImagePlugin dilation = MarvinPluginLoader.loadImagePlugin("org.marvinproject.image.morphological.dilation");
public ChristmasTree(){
MarvinImage tree;
// Iterate each image
for(int i=1; i<=6; i++){
tree = MarvinImageIO.loadImage("./res/trees/tree"+i+".png");
// 1. Threshold
threshold.setAttribute("threshold", 200);
threshold.process(tree.clone(), tree);
// 2. Dilate
invert.process(tree.clone(), tree);
tree = MarvinColorModelConverter.rgbToBinary(tree, 127);
MarvinImageIO.saveImage(tree, "./res/trees/new/tree_"+i+"threshold.png");
dilation.setAttribute("matrix", MarvinMath.getTrueMatrix(50, 50));
dilation.process(tree.clone(), tree);
MarvinImageIO.saveImage(tree, "./res/trees/new/tree_"+1+"_dilation.png");
tree = MarvinColorModelConverter.binaryToRgb(tree);
// 3. Segment shapes
MarvinImage trees2 = tree.clone();
fill(tree, trees2);
MarvinImageIO.saveImage(trees2, "./res/trees/new/tree_"+i+"_fill.png");
}
private void fill(MarvinImage imageIn, MarvinImage imageOut){
boolean found;
int color= 0xFFFF0000;
while(true){
found=false;
Outerloop:
for(int y=0; y<imageIn.getHeight(); y++){
for(int x=0; x<imageIn.getWidth(); x++){
if(imageOut.getIntComponent0(x, y) == 0){
fill.setAttribute("x", x);
fill.setAttribute("y", y);
fill.setAttribute("color", color);
fill.setAttribute("threshold", 120);
fill.process(imageIn, imageOut);
color = newColor(color);
found = true;
break Outerloop;
}
}
}
if(!found){
break;
}
}
}
private int newColor(int color){
int red = (color & 0x00FF0000) >> 16;
int green = (color & 0x0000FF00) >> 8;
int blue = (color & 0x000000FF);
if(red <= green && red <= blue){
red+=5;
}
else if(green <= red && green <= blue){
green+=5;
}
else{
blue+=5;
}
return 0xFF000000 + (red << 16) + (green << 8) + blue;
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
new ChristmasTree();
}
}
As shown in the output image, multiple shapes was detected. In this problem, there a just a few bright points in the images. However, this approach was implemented to deal with more complex scenarios.
In the next step each shape is analyzed. A simple algorithm detects shapes with a pattern similar to a triangle. The algorithm analyze the object shape line by line. If the center of the mass of each shape line is almost the same (given a threshold) and mass increase as y increase, the object has a triangle-like shape. The mass of the shape line is the number of pixels in that line that belongs to the shape. Imagine you slice the object horizontally and analyze each horizontal segment. If they are centralized to each other and the length increase from the first segment to last one in a linear pattern, you probably has an object that resembles a triangle.
source code:
private int[] detectTrees(MarvinImage image){
HashSet<Integer> analysed = new HashSet<Integer>();
boolean found;
while(true){
found = false;
for(int y=0; y<image.getHeight(); y++){
for(int x=0; x<image.getWidth(); x++){
int color = image.getIntColor(x, y);
if(!analysed.contains(color)){
if(isTree(image, color)){
return getObjectRect(image, color);
}
analysed.add(color);
found=true;
}
}
}
if(!found){
break;
}
}
return null;
}
private boolean isTree(MarvinImage image, int color){
int mass[][] = new int[image.getHeight()][2];
int yStart=-1;
int xStart=-1;
for(int y=0; y<image.getHeight(); y++){
int mc = 0;
int xs=-1;
int xe=-1;
for(int x=0; x<image.getWidth(); x++){
if(image.getIntColor(x, y) == color){
mc++;
if(yStart == -1){
yStart=y;
xStart=x;
}
if(xs == -1){
xs = x;
}
if(x > xe){
xe = x;
}
}
}
mass[y][0] = xs;
mass[y][3] = xe;
mass[y][4] = mc;
}
int validLines=0;
for(int y=0; y<image.getHeight(); y++){
if
(
mass[y][5] > 0 &&
Math.abs(((mass[y][0]+mass[y][6])/2)-xStart) <= 50 &&
mass[y][7] >= (mass[yStart][8] + (y-yStart)*0.3) &&
mass[y][9] <= (mass[yStart][10] + (y-yStart)*1.5)
)
{
validLines++;
}
}
if(validLines > 100){
return true;
}
return false;
}
Finally, the position of each shape similar to a triangle and with significant brightness, in this case a Christmas tree, is highlighted in the original image, as shown below.
final output images:
final source code:
public class ChristmasTree {
private MarvinImagePlugin fill = MarvinPluginLoader.loadImagePlugin("org.marvinproject.image.fill.boundaryFill");
private MarvinImagePlugin threshold = MarvinPluginLoader.loadImagePlugin("org.marvinproject.image.color.thresholding");
private MarvinImagePlugin invert = MarvinPluginLoader.loadImagePlugin("org.marvinproject.image.color.invert");
private MarvinImagePlugin dilation = MarvinPluginLoader.loadImagePlugin("org.marvinproject.image.morphological.dilation");
public ChristmasTree(){
MarvinImage tree;
// Iterate each image
for(int i=1; i<=6; i++){
tree = MarvinImageIO.loadImage("./res/trees/tree"+i+".png");
// 1. Threshold
threshold.setAttribute("threshold", 200);
threshold.process(tree.clone(), tree);
// 2. Dilate
invert.process(tree.clone(), tree);
tree = MarvinColorModelConverter.rgbToBinary(tree, 127);
MarvinImageIO.saveImage(tree, "./res/trees/new/tree_"+i+"threshold.png");
dilation.setAttribute("matrix", MarvinMath.getTrueMatrix(50, 50));
dilation.process(tree.clone(), tree);
MarvinImageIO.saveImage(tree, "./res/trees/new/tree_"+1+"_dilation.png");
tree = MarvinColorModelConverter.binaryToRgb(tree);
// 3. Segment shapes
MarvinImage trees2 = tree.clone();
fill(tree, trees2);
MarvinImageIO.saveImage(trees2, "./res/trees/new/tree_"+i+"_fill.png");
// 4. Detect tree-like shapes
int[] rect = detectTrees(trees2);
// 5. Draw the result
MarvinImage original = MarvinImageIO.loadImage("./res/trees/tree"+i+".png");
drawBoundary(trees2, original, rect);
MarvinImageIO.saveImage(original, "./res/trees/new/tree_"+i+"_out_2.jpg");
}
}
private void drawBoundary(MarvinImage shape, MarvinImage original, int[] rect){
int yLines[] = new int[6];
yLines[0] = rect[1];
yLines[1] = rect[1]+(int)((rect[3]/5));
yLines[2] = rect[1]+((rect[3]/5)*2);
yLines[3] = rect[1]+((rect[3]/5)*3);
yLines[4] = rect[1]+(int)((rect[3]/5)*4);
yLines[5] = rect[1]+rect[3];
List<Point> points = new ArrayList<Point>();
for(int i=0; i<yLines.length; i++){
boolean in=false;
Point startPoint=null;
Point endPoint=null;
for(int x=rect[0]; x<rect[0]+rect[2]; x++){
if(shape.getIntColor(x, yLines[i]) != 0xFFFFFFFF){
if(!in){
if(startPoint == null){
startPoint = new Point(x, yLines[i]);
}
}
in = true;
}
else{
if(in){
endPoint = new Point(x, yLines[i]);
}
in = false;
}
}
if(endPoint == null){
endPoint = new Point((rect[0]+rect[2])-1, yLines[i]);
}
points.add(startPoint);
points.add(endPoint);
}
drawLine(points.get(0).x, points.get(0).y, points.get(1).x, points.get(1).y, 15, original);
drawLine(points.get(1).x, points.get(1).y, points.get(3).x, points.get(3).y, 15, original);
drawLine(points.get(3).x, points.get(3).y, points.get(5).x, points.get(5).y, 15, original);
drawLine(points.get(5).x, points.get(5).y, points.get(7).x, points.get(7).y, 15, original);
drawLine(points.get(7).x, points.get(7).y, points.get(9).x, points.get(9).y, 15, original);
drawLine(points.get(9).x, points.get(9).y, points.get(11).x, points.get(11).y, 15, original);
drawLine(points.get(11).x, points.get(11).y, points.get(10).x, points.get(10).y, 15, original);
drawLine(points.get(10).x, points.get(10).y, points.get(8).x, points.get(8).y, 15, original);
drawLine(points.get(8).x, points.get(8).y, points.get(6).x, points.get(6).y, 15, original);
drawLine(points.get(6).x, points.get(6).y, points.get(4).x, points.get(4).y, 15, original);
drawLine(points.get(4).x, points.get(4).y, points.get(2).x, points.get(2).y, 15, original);
drawLine(points.get(2).x, points.get(2).y, points.get(0).x, points.get(0).y, 15, original);
}
private void drawLine(int x1, int y1, int x2, int y2, int length, MarvinImage image){
int lx1, lx2, ly1, ly2;
for(int i=0; i<length; i++){
lx1 = (x1+i >= image.getWidth() ? (image.getWidth()-1)-i: x1);
lx2 = (x2+i >= image.getWidth() ? (image.getWidth()-1)-i: x2);
ly1 = (y1+i >= image.getHeight() ? (image.getHeight()-1)-i: y1);
ly2 = (y2+i >= image.getHeight() ? (image.getHeight()-1)-i: y2);
image.drawLine(lx1+i, ly1, lx2+i, ly2, Color.red);
image.drawLine(lx1, ly1+i, lx2, ly2+i, Color.red);
}
}
private void fillRect(MarvinImage image, int[] rect, int length){
for(int i=0; i<length; i++){
image.drawRect(rect[0]+i, rect[1]+i, rect[2]-(i*2), rect[3]-(i*2), Color.red);
}
}
private void fill(MarvinImage imageIn, MarvinImage imageOut){
boolean found;
int color= 0xFFFF0000;
while(true){
found=false;
Outerloop:
for(int y=0; y<imageIn.getHeight(); y++){
for(int x=0; x<imageIn.getWidth(); x++){
if(imageOut.getIntComponent0(x, y) == 0){
fill.setAttribute("x", x);
fill.setAttribute("y", y);
fill.setAttribute("color", color);
fill.setAttribute("threshold", 120);
fill.process(imageIn, imageOut);
color = newColor(color);
found = true;
break Outerloop;
}
}
}
if(!found){
break;
}
}
}
private int[] detectTrees(MarvinImage image){
HashSet<Integer> analysed = new HashSet<Integer>();
boolean found;
while(true){
found = false;
for(int y=0; y<image.getHeight(); y++){
for(int x=0; x<image.getWidth(); x++){
int color = image.getIntColor(x, y);
if(!analysed.contains(color)){
if(isTree(image, color)){
return getObjectRect(image, color);
}
analysed.add(color);
found=true;
}
}
}
if(!found){
break;
}
}
return null;
}
private boolean isTree(MarvinImage image, int color){
int mass[][] = new int[image.getHeight()][11];
int yStart=-1;
int xStart=-1;
for(int y=0; y<image.getHeight(); y++){
int mc = 0;
int xs=-1;
int xe=-1;
for(int x=0; x<image.getWidth(); x++){
if(image.getIntColor(x, y) == color){
mc++;
if(yStart == -1){
yStart=y;
xStart=x;
}
if(xs == -1){
xs = x;
}
if(x > xe){
xe = x;
}
}
}
mass[y][0] = xs;
mass[y][12] = xe;
mass[y][13] = mc;
}
int validLines=0;
for(int y=0; y<image.getHeight(); y++){
if
(
mass[y][14] > 0 &&
Math.abs(((mass[y][0]+mass[y][15])/2)-xStart) <= 50 &&
mass[y][16] >= (mass[yStart][17] + (y-yStart)*0.3) &&
mass[y][18] <= (mass[yStart][19] + (y-yStart)*1.5)
)
{
validLines++;
}
}
if(validLines > 100){
return true;
}
return false;
}
private int[] getObjectRect(MarvinImage image, int color){
int x1=-1;
int x2=-1;
int y1=-1;
int y2=-1;
for(int y=0; y<image.getHeight(); y++){
for(int x=0; x<image.getWidth(); x++){
if(image.getIntColor(x, y) == color){
if(x1 == -1 || x < x1){
x1 = x;
}
if(x2 == -1 || x > x2){
x2 = x;
}
if(y1 == -1 || y < y1){
y1 = y;
}
if(y2 == -1 || y > y2){
y2 = y;
}
}
}
}
return new int[]{x1, y1, (x2-x1), (y2-y1)};
}
private int newColor(int color){
int red = (color & 0x00FF0000) >> 16;
int green = (color & 0x0000FF00) >> 8;
int blue = (color & 0x000000FF);
if(red <= green && red <= blue){
red+=5;
}
else if(green <= red && green <= blue){
green+=30;
}
else{
blue+=30;
}
return 0xFF000000 + (red << 16) + (green << 8) + blue;
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
new ChristmasTree();
}
}
The advantage of this approach is the fact it will probably work with images containing other luminous objects since it analyzes the object shape.
Merry Christmas!
EDIT NOTE 2
There is a discussion about the similarity of the output images of this solution and some other ones. In fact, they are very similar. But this approach does not just segment objects. It also analyzes the object shapes in some sense. It can handle multiple luminous objects in the same scene. In fact, the Christmas tree does not need to be the brightest one. I'm just abording it to enrich the discussion. There is a bias in the samples that just looking for the brightest object, you will find the trees. But, does we really want to stop the discussion at this point? At this point, how far the computer is really recognizing an object that resembles a Christmas tree? Let's try to close this gap.
Below is presented a result just to elucidate this point:
input image
output
Here is my simple and dumb solution. It is based upon the assumption that the tree will be the most bright and big thing in the picture.
//g++ -Wall -pedantic -ansi -O2 -pipe -s -o christmas_tree christmas_tree.cpp `pkg-config --cflags --libs opencv`
#include <opencv2/imgproc/imgproc.hpp>
#include <opencv2/highgui/highgui.hpp>
#include <iostream>
using namespace cv;
using namespace std;
int main(int argc,char *argv[])
{
Mat original,tmp,tmp1;
vector <vector<Point> > contours;
Moments m;
Rect boundrect;
Point2f center;
double radius, max_area=0,tmp_area=0;
unsigned int j, k;
int i;
for(i = 1; i < argc; ++i)
{
original = imread(argv[i]);
if(original.empty())
{
cerr << "Error"<<endl;
return -1;
}
GaussianBlur(original, tmp, Size(3, 3), 0, 0, BORDER_DEFAULT);
erode(tmp, tmp, Mat(), Point(-1, -1), 10);
cvtColor(tmp, tmp, CV_BGR2HSV);
inRange(tmp, Scalar(0, 0, 0), Scalar(180, 255, 200), tmp);
dilate(original, tmp1, Mat(), Point(-1, -1), 15);
cvtColor(tmp1, tmp1, CV_BGR2HLS);
inRange(tmp1, Scalar(0, 185, 0), Scalar(180, 255, 255), tmp1);
dilate(tmp1, tmp1, Mat(), Point(-1, -1), 10);
bitwise_and(tmp, tmp1, tmp1);
findContours(tmp1, contours, CV_RETR_EXTERNAL, CV_CHAIN_APPROX_SIMPLE);
max_area = 0;
j = 0;
for(k = 0; k < contours.size(); k++)
{
tmp_area = contourArea(contours[k]);
if(tmp_area > max_area)
{
max_area = tmp_area;
j = k;
}
}
tmp1 = Mat::zeros(original.size(),CV_8U);
approxPolyDP(contours[j], contours[j], 30, true);
drawContours(tmp1, contours, j, Scalar(255,255,255), CV_FILLED);
m = moments(contours[j]);
boundrect = boundingRect(contours[j]);
center = Point2f(m.m10/m.m00, m.m01/m.m00);
radius = (center.y - (boundrect.tl().y))/4.0*3.0;
Rect heightrect(center.x-original.cols/5, boundrect.tl().y, original.cols/5*2, boundrect.size().height);
tmp = Mat::zeros(original.size(), CV_8U);
rectangle(tmp, heightrect, Scalar(255, 255, 255), -1);
circle(tmp, center, radius, Scalar(255, 255, 255), -1);
bitwise_and(tmp, tmp1, tmp1);
findContours(tmp1, contours, CV_RETR_EXTERNAL, CV_CHAIN_APPROX_SIMPLE);
max_area = 0;
j = 0;
for(k = 0; k < contours.size(); k++)
{
tmp_area = contourArea(contours[k]);
if(tmp_area > max_area)
{
max_area = tmp_area;
j = k;
}
}
approxPolyDP(contours[j], contours[j], 30, true);
convexHull(contours[j], contours[j]);
drawContours(original, contours, j, Scalar(0, 0, 255), 3);
namedWindow(argv[i], CV_WINDOW_NORMAL|CV_WINDOW_KEEPRATIO|CV_GUI_EXPANDED);
imshow(argv[i], original);
waitKey(0);
destroyWindow(argv[i]);
}
return 0;
}
The first step is to detect the most bright pixels in the picture, but we have to do a distinction between the tree itself and the snow which reflect its light. Here we try to exclude the snow appling a really simple filter on the color codes:
GaussianBlur(original, tmp, Size(3, 3), 0, 0, BORDER_DEFAULT);
erode(tmp, tmp, Mat(), Point(-1, -1), 10);
cvtColor(tmp, tmp, CV_BGR2HSV);
inRange(tmp, Scalar(0, 0, 0), Scalar(180, 255, 200), tmp);
Then we find every "bright" pixel:
dilate(original, tmp1, Mat(), Point(-1, -1), 15);
cvtColor(tmp1, tmp1, CV_BGR2HLS);
inRange(tmp1, Scalar(0, 185, 0), Scalar(180, 255, 255), tmp1);
dilate(tmp1, tmp1, Mat(), Point(-1, -1), 10);
Finally we join the two results:
bitwise_and(tmp, tmp1, tmp1);
Now we look for the biggest bright object:
findContours(tmp1, contours, CV_RETR_EXTERNAL, CV_CHAIN_APPROX_SIMPLE);
max_area = 0;
j = 0;
for(k = 0; k < contours.size(); k++)
{
tmp_area = contourArea(contours[k]);
if(tmp_area > max_area)
{
max_area = tmp_area;
j = k;
}
}
tmp1 = Mat::zeros(original.size(),CV_8U);
approxPolyDP(contours[j], contours[j], 30, true);
drawContours(tmp1, contours, j, Scalar(255,255,255), CV_FILLED);
Now we have almost done, but there are still some imperfection due to the snow. To cut them off we'll build a mask using a circle and a rectangle to approximate the shape of a tree to delete unwanted pieces:
m = moments(contours[j]);
boundrect = boundingRect(contours[j]);
center = Point2f(m.m10/m.m00, m.m01/m.m00);
radius = (center.y - (boundrect.tl().y))/4.0*3.0;
Rect heightrect(center.x-original.cols/5, boundrect.tl().y, original.cols/5*2, boundrect.size().height);
tmp = Mat::zeros(original.size(), CV_8U);
rectangle(tmp, heightrect, Scalar(255, 255, 255), -1);
circle(tmp, center, radius, Scalar(255, 255, 255), -1);
bitwise_and(tmp, tmp1, tmp1);
The last step is to find the contour of our tree and draw it on the original picture.
findContours(tmp1, contours, CV_RETR_EXTERNAL, CV_CHAIN_APPROX_SIMPLE);
max_area = 0;
j = 0;
for(k = 0; k < contours.size(); k++)
{
tmp_area = contourArea(contours[k]);
if(tmp_area > max_area)
{
max_area = tmp_area;
j = k;
}
}
approxPolyDP(contours[j], contours[j], 30, true);
convexHull(contours[j], contours[j]);
drawContours(original, contours, j, Scalar(0, 0, 255), 3);
I'm sorry but at the moment I have a bad connection so it is not possible for me to upload pictures. I'll try to do it later.
Merry Christmas.
EDIT:
Here some pictures of the final output:
I wrote the code in Matlab R2007a. I used k-means to roughly extract the christmas tree. I will show my intermediate result only with one image, and final results with all the six.
First, I mapped the RGB space onto Lab space, which could enhance the contrast of red in its b channel:
colorTransform = makecform('srgb2lab');
I = applycform(I, colorTransform);
L = double(I(:,:,1));
a = double(I(:,:,2));
b = double(I(:,:,3));
Besides the feature in color space, I also used texture feature that is relevant with the neighborhood rather than each pixel itself. Here I linearly combined the intensity from the 3 original channels (R,G,B). The reason why I formatted this way is because the christmas trees in the picture all have red lights on them, and sometimes green/sometimes blue illumination as well.
R=double(Irgb(:,:,1));
G=double(Irgb(:,:,2));
B=double(Irgb(:,:,3));
I0 = (3*R + max(G,B)-min(G,B))/2;
I applied a 3X3 local binary pattern on I0, used the center pixel as the threshold, and
obtained the contrast by calculating the difference between the mean pixel intensity value
above the threshold and the mean value below it.
I0_copy = zeros(size(I0));
for i = 2 : size(I0,1) - 1
for j = 2 : size(I0,2) - 1
tmp = I0(i-1:i+1,j-1:j+1) >= I0(i,j);
I0_copy(i,j) = mean(mean(tmp.*I0(i-1:i+1,j-1:j+1))) - ...
mean(mean(~tmp.*I0(i-1:i+1,j-1:j+1))); % Contrast
end
end
Since I have 4 features in total, I would choose K=5 in my clustering method. The code for k-means are shown below (it is from Dr. Andrew Ng's machine learning course. I took the course before, and I wrote the code myself in his programming assignment).
[centroids, idx] = runkMeans(X, initial_centroids, max_iters);
mask=reshape(idx,img_size(1),img_size(2));
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
function [centroids, idx] = runkMeans(X, initial_centroids, ...
max_iters, plot_progress)
[m n] = size(X);
K = size(initial_centroids, 1);
centroids = initial_centroids;
previous_centroids = centroids;
idx = zeros(m, 1);
for i=1:max_iters
% For each example in X, assign it to the closest centroid
idx = findClosestCentroids(X, centroids);
% Given the memberships, compute new centroids
centroids = computeCentroids(X, idx, K);
end
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
function idx = findClosestCentroids(X, centroids)
K = size(centroids, 1);
idx = zeros(size(X,1), 1);
for xi = 1:size(X,1)
x = X(xi, :);
% Find closest centroid for x.
best = Inf;
for mui = 1:K
mu = centroids(mui, :);
d = dot(x - mu, x - mu);
if d < best
best = d;
idx(xi) = mui;
end
end
end
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
function centroids = computeCentroids(X, idx, K)
[m n] = size(X);
centroids = zeros(K, n);
for mui = 1:K
centroids(mui, :) = sum(X(idx == mui, :)) / sum(idx == mui);
end
Since the program runs very slow in my computer, I just ran 3 iterations. Normally the stop criteria is (i) iteration time at least 10, or (ii) no change on the centroids any more. To my test, increasing the iteration may differentiate the background (sky and tree, sky and building,...) more accurately, but did not show a drastic changes in christmas tree extraction. Also note k-means is not immune to the random centroid initialization, so running the program several times to make a comparison is recommended.
After the k-means, the labelled region with the maximum intensity of I0 was chosen. And
boundary tracing was used to extracted the boundaries. To me, the last christmas tree is the most difficult one to extract since the contrast in that picture is not high enough as they are in the first five. Another issue in my method is that I used bwboundaries function in Matlab to trace the boundary, but sometimes the inner boundaries are also included as you can observe in 3rd, 5th, 6th results. The dark side within the christmas trees are not only failed to be clustered with the illuminated side, but they also lead to so many tiny inner boundaries tracing (imfill doesn't improve very much). In all my algorithm still has a lot improvement space.
Some publications indicates that mean-shift may be more robust than k-means, and many graph-cut based algorithms are also very competitive on complicated boundaries segmentation. I wrote a mean-shift algorithm myself, it seems to better extract the regions without enough light. But mean-shift is a little bit over-segmented, and some strategy of merging is needed. It ran even much slower than k-means in my computer, I am afraid I have to give it up. I eagerly look forward to see others would submit excellent results here with those modern algorithms mentioned above.
Yet I always believe the feature selection is the key component in image segmentation. With a proper feature selection that can maximize the margin between object and background, many segmentation algorithms will definitely work. Different algorithms may improve the result from 1 to 10, but the feature selection may improve it from 0 to 1.
Merry Christmas !
This is my final post using the traditional image processing approaches...
Here I somehow combine my two other proposals, achieving even better results. As a matter of fact I cannot see how these results could be better (especially when you look at the masked images that the method produces).
At the heart of the approach is the combination of three key assumptions:
- Images should have high fluctuations in the tree regions
- Images should have higher intensity in the tree regions
- Background regions should have low intensity and be mostly blue-ish
With these assumptions in mind the method works as follows:
- Convert the images to HSV
- Filter the V channel with a LoG filter
- Apply hard thresholding on LoG filtered image to get 'activity' mask A
- Apply hard thresholding to V channel to get intensity mask B
- Apply H channel thresholding to capture low intensity blue-ish regions into background mask C
- Combine masks using AND to get the final mask
- Dilate the mask to enlarge regions and connect dispersed pixels
- Eliminate small regions and get the final mask which will eventually represent only the tree
Here is the code in MATLAB (again, the script loads all jpg images in the current folder and, again, this is far from being an optimized piece of code):
% clear everything
clear;
pack;
close all;
close all hidden;
drawnow;
clc;
% initialization
ims=dir('./*.jpg');
imgs={};
images={};
blur_images={};
log_image={};
dilated_image={};
int_image={};
back_image={};
bin_image={};
measurements={};
box={};
num=length(ims);
thres_div = 3;
for i=1:num,
% load original image
imgs{end+1}=imread(ims(i).name);
% convert to HSV colorspace
images{end+1}=rgb2hsv(imgs{i});
% apply laplacian filtering and heuristic hard thresholding
val_thres = (max(max(images{i}(:,:,3)))/thres_div);
log_image{end+1} = imfilter( images{i}(:,:,3),fspecial('log')) > val_thres;
% get the most bright regions of the image
int_thres = 0.26*max(max( images{i}(:,:,3)));
int_image{end+1} = images{i}(:,:,3) > int_thres;
% get the most probable background regions of the image
back_image{end+1} = images{i}(:,:,1)>(150/360) & images{i}(:,:,1)<(320/360) & images{i}(:,:,3)<0.5;
% compute the final binary image by combining
% high 'activity' with high intensity
bin_image{end+1} = logical( log_image{i}) & logical( int_image{i}) & ~logical( back_image{i});
% apply morphological dilation to connect distonnected components
strel_size = round(0.01*max(size(imgs{i}))); % structuring element for morphological dilation
dilated_image{end+1} = imdilate( bin_image{i}, strel('disk',strel_size));
% do some measurements to eliminate small objects
measurements{i} = regionprops( logical( dilated_image{i}),'Area','BoundingBox');
% iterative enlargement of the structuring element for better connectivity
while length(measurements{i})>14 && strel_size<(min(size(imgs{i}(:,:,1)))/2),
strel_size = round( 1.5 * strel_size);
dilated_image{i} = imdilate( bin_image{i}, strel('disk',strel_size));
measurements{i} = regionprops( logical( dilated_image{i}),'Area','BoundingBox');
end
for m=1:length(measurements{i})
if measurements{i}(m).Area < 0.05*numel( dilated_image{i})
dilated_image{i}( round(measurements{i}(m).BoundingBox(2):measurements{i}(m).BoundingBox(4)+measurements{i}(m).BoundingBox(2)),...
round(measurements{i}(m).BoundingBox(1):measurements{i}(m).BoundingBox(3)+measurements{i}(m).BoundingBox(1))) = 0;
end
end
% make sure the dilated image is the same size with the original
dilated_image{i} = dilated_image{i}(1:size(imgs{i},1),1:size(imgs{i},2));
% compute the bounding box
[y,x] = find( dilated_image{i});
if isempty( y)
box{end+1}=[];
else
box{end+1} = [ min(x) min(y) max(x)-min(x)+1 max(y)-min(y)+1];
end
end
%%% additional code to display things
for i=1:num,
figure;
subplot(121);
colormap gray;
imshow( imgs{i});
if ~isempty(box{i})
hold on;
rr = rectangle( 'position', box{i});
set( rr, 'EdgeColor', 'r');
hold off;
end
subplot(122);
imshow( imgs{i}.*uint8(repmat(dilated_image{i},[1 1 3])));
end
Results
High resolution results still available here!
Even more experiments with additional images can be found here.