Sorting using Comparator- Descending order (User defined classes) [closed]
I want to sort my objects in descending order using comparator.
class Person {
private int age;
}
Here I want to sort a array of Person objects.
How can I do this?
Solution 1:
You can do the descending sort of a user-defined class this way overriding the compare() method,
Collections.sort(unsortedList,new Comparator<Person>() {
@Override
public int compare(Person a, Person b) {
return b.getName().compareTo(a.getName());
}
});
Or by using Collection.reverse()
to sort descending as user Prince mentioned in his comment.
And you can do the ascending sort like this,
Collections.sort(unsortedList,new Comparator<Person>() {
@Override
public int compare(Person a, Person b) {
return a.getName().compareTo(b.getName());
}
});
Replace the above code with a Lambda expression(Java 8 onwards) we get concise:
Collections.sort(personList, (Person a, Person b) -> b.getName().compareTo(a.getName()));
As of Java 8, List has sort() method which takes Comparator as parameter(more concise) :
personList.sort((a,b)->b.getName().compareTo(a.getName()));
Here a
and b
are inferred as Person type by lambda expression.
Solution 2:
For whats its worth here is my standard answer. The only thing new here is that is uses the Collections.reverseOrder(). Plus it puts all suggestions into one example:
/*
** Use the Collections API to sort a List for you.
**
** When your class has a "natural" sort order you can implement
** the Comparable interface.
**
** You can use an alternate sort order when you implement
** a Comparator for your class.
*/
import java.util.*;
public class Person implements Comparable<Person>
{
String name;
int age;
public Person(String name, int age)
{
this.name = name;
this.age = age;
}
public String getName()
{
return name;
}
public int getAge()
{
return age;
}
public String toString()
{
return name + " : " + age;
}
/*
** Implement the natural order for this class
*/
public int compareTo(Person p)
{
return getName().compareTo(p.getName());
}
static class AgeComparator implements Comparator<Person>
{
public int compare(Person p1, Person p2)
{
int age1 = p1.getAge();
int age2 = p2.getAge();
if (age1 == age2)
return 0;
else if (age1 > age2)
return 1;
else
return -1;
}
}
public static void main(String[] args)
{
List<Person> people = new ArrayList<Person>();
people.add( new Person("Homer", 38) );
people.add( new Person("Marge", 35) );
people.add( new Person("Bart", 15) );
people.add( new Person("Lisa", 13) );
// Sort by natural order
Collections.sort(people);
System.out.println("Sort by Natural order");
System.out.println("\t" + people);
// Sort by reverse natural order
Collections.sort(people, Collections.reverseOrder());
System.out.println("Sort by reverse natural order");
System.out.println("\t" + people);
// Use a Comparator to sort by age
Collections.sort(people, new Person.AgeComparator());
System.out.println("Sort using Age Comparator");
System.out.println("\t" + people);
// Use a Comparator to sort by descending age
Collections.sort(people,
Collections.reverseOrder(new Person.AgeComparator()));
System.out.println("Sort using Reverse Age Comparator");
System.out.println("\t" + people);
}
}
Solution 3:
I would create a comparator for the person class that can be parametrized with a certain sorting behaviour. Here I can set the sorting order but it can be modified to allow sorting for other person attributes as well.
public class PersonComparator implements Comparator<Person> {
public enum SortOrder {ASCENDING, DESCENDING}
private SortOrder sortOrder;
public PersonComparator(SortOrder sortOrder) {
this.sortOrder = sortOrder;
}
@Override
public int compare(Person person1, Person person2) {
Integer age1 = person1.getAge();
Integer age2 = person2.getAge();
int compare = Math.signum(age1.compareTo(age2));
if (sortOrder == ASCENDING) {
return compare;
} else {
return compare * (-1);
}
}
}
(hope it compiles now, I have no IDE or JDK at hand, coded 'blind')
Edit
Thanks to Thomas, edited the code. I wouldn't say that the usage of Math.signum is good, performant, effective, but I'd like to keep it as a reminder, that the compareTo method can return any integer and multiplying by (-1) will fail if the implementation returns Integer.MIN_INTEGER... And I removed the setter because it's cheap enough to construct a new PersonComparator just when it's needed.
But I keep the boxing because it shows that I rely on an existing Comparable implementation. Could have done something like Comparable<Integer> age1 = new Integer(person1.getAge());
but that looked too ugly. The idea was to show a pattern which could easily be adapted to other Person attributes, like name, birthday as Date and so on.