Images not responsive by default in Twitter Bootstrap 3?
It looks like with the new version 3.0 I have to set the class names of an image to col-lg-4 col-sm-4 col-4
if the image is part of div with the same class names to make the image responsive with all breakpoints.
In version 2 the images CSS properties inherited by default the parent's div properties.
Is this correct?
Solution 1:
Bootstrap 4
For Bootstrap 4 use Sass (SCSS):
// make images responisve by default
img {
@extend .img-fluid;
}
answer updated for version 3
Bootstrap 3 has a special class for responsive images (set max-width to 100%). This class is defined as:
.img-responsive {
display: block;
height: auto;
max-width: 100%;
}
Note img tag gets by default:
img {
vertical-align: middle;
border: 0;
page-break-inside: avoid;
max-width: 100% !important;
}
So use class="img-responsive"
to make your images responsive.
To make all images responsive by default:
css: add the code below under the bootstrap css:
img {
display: block;
height: auto;
max-width: 100%;
}
less: add the code below in your mixins.less:
img {
&:extend(.img-responsive);
}
Note: requires Less 1.4.0. see: https://stackoverflow.com/a/15573240/1596547
Carousel
img tags inside a carousel are responsive by default
Semantic rules
See also the answer of @its-me (https://stackoverflow.com/a/18653778/1596547). Using the above to make all your images responsive by default turns your images to block level elements. Block level elements are not allowed in paragraphs (<p>
), see: https://stackoverflow.com/a/4291515/1596547
As far as i understand the distinction of block-level vs. inline elements is replaced with a more complex set of content categories. See also: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Inline_elemente#Inline_vs._block-level.
So in HTML5 a p tag can contain any phrasing element intermixed with normal character data. (see: http://www.w3.org/TR/html-markup/p.html) The img
tag is such a phrasing element. The img
tag's default value for the display property is indeed inline-block
. Changing the display property to block does not violate any of the preceding rules.
Block level elements (display:block
) take all the available space of their parent, which seems exactly what you expect for responsive images. So setting display: block;
seems a reasonable choice, which has to be preferred above the inline-block
declaration.
Images inside p elements which require inline-block
as suggest by @its-me (https://stackoverflow.com/a/18653778/1596547) should maybe not be responsive at all.
Solution 2:
Excellent suggestion by @BassJobsen, but I'd use display: inline-block;
instead of display: block;
as that feels more semantic 1 (which means you can be a bit more sure you are not messing up somewhere else).
So, mine would look like this:
img {
display: inline-block;
height: auto;
max-width: 100%;
}
Please do let me know if my understanding is flawed. :)
[1]: For one, images are almost always wrapped in a block-level element if that's the use case; and then again, we also use images in elements like paragraphs (p
), where an inline-block
would be more appropriate than a block
element.