height: 100% or min-height: 100% for html and body elements?
While designing layouts I set the html, body
elements' height
to 100%
but in some cases, this fails, so what should be used?
html, body {
height: 100%;
}
or
html, body {
min-height: 100%;
}
Well, this is not opinion based as each method has its own flaws, so what's the recommended way to go for and why?
Solution 1:
If you're trying to apply background images to html
and body
that fill up the entire browser window, neither. Use this instead:
html {
height: 100%;
}
body {
min-height: 100%;
}
My reasoning is given here (where I explain holistically how to apply backgrounds in this manner):
Incidentally, the reason why you have to specify
height
andmin-height
tohtml
andbody
respectively is because neither element has any intrinsic height. Both areheight: auto
by default. It is the viewport that has 100% height, soheight: 100%
is taken from the viewport, then applied tobody
as a minimum to allow for scrolling of content.
The first way, using height: 100%
on both, prevents body
from expanding with its contents once they start to grow beyond the viewport height. Technically this doesn't prevent the content from scrolling, but it does cause body
to leave a gap beneath the fold, which is usually undesirable.
The second way, using min-height: 100%
on both, doesn't cause body
to expand to the full height of html
because min-height
with a percentage doesn't work on body
unless html
has an explicit height
.
For the sake of completeness, section 10 of CSS2.1 contains all the details, but it's an extremely convoluted read so you can skip it if you're not interested in anything beyond what I've explained here.
Solution 2:
You can use viewport height (vh
) unit:
body {
min-height: 100vh;
}
It is relative to screen, not to parent height, so you don't need html height: 100%.