How can I find the method that called the current method?

Try this:

using System.Diagnostics;
// Get call stack
StackTrace stackTrace = new StackTrace(); 
// Get calling method name
Console.WriteLine(stackTrace.GetFrame(1).GetMethod().Name);

one-liner:

(new System.Diagnostics.StackTrace()).GetFrame(1).GetMethod().Name

It is from Get Calling Method using Reflection [C#].

In C# 5, you can get that information using caller info:

//using System.Runtime.CompilerServices;
public void SendError(string Message, [CallerMemberName] string callerName = "") 
{ 
    Console.WriteLine(callerName + "called me."); 
}

You can also get the [CallerFilePath] and [CallerLineNumber].

You can use Caller Information and optional parameters:

public static string WhoseThere([CallerMemberName] string memberName = "")
{
       return memberName;
}

This test illustrates this:

[Test]
public void Should_get_name_of_calling_method()
{
    var methodName = CachingHelpers.WhoseThere();
    Assert.That(methodName, Is.EqualTo("Should_get_name_of_calling_method"));
}

While the StackTrace works quite fast above and would not be a performance issue in most cases the Caller Information is much faster still. In a sample of 1000 iterations, I clocked it as 40 times faster.

A quick recap of the 2 approaches with speed comparison being the important part.

http://geekswithblogs.net/BlackRabbitCoder/archive/2013/07/25/c.net-little-wonders-getting-caller-information.aspx

Determining the caller at compile-time

static void Log(object message, 
[CallerMemberName] string memberName = "",
[CallerFilePath] string fileName = "",
[CallerLineNumber] int lineNumber = 0)
{
    // we'll just use a simple Console write for now    
    Console.WriteLine("{0}({1}):{2} - {3}", fileName, lineNumber, memberName, message);
}

Determining the caller using the stack

static void Log(object message)
{
    // frame 1, true for source info
    StackFrame frame = new StackFrame(1, true);
    var method = frame.GetMethod();
    var fileName = frame.GetFileName();
    var lineNumber = frame.GetFileLineNumber();

    // we'll just use a simple Console write for now    
    Console.WriteLine("{0}({1}):{2} - {3}", fileName, lineNumber, method.Name, message);
}

Comparison of the 2 approaches

Time for 1,000,000 iterations with Attributes: 196 ms
Time for 1,000,000 iterations with StackTrace: 5096 ms

So you see, using the attributes is much, much faster! Nearly 25x faster in fact.

We can improve on Mr Assad's code (the current accepted answer) just a little bit by instantiating only the frame we actually need rather than the entire stack:

new StackFrame(1).GetMethod().Name;

This might perform a little better, though in all likelihood it still has to use the full stack to create that single frame. Also, it still has the same caveats that Alex Lyman pointed out (optimizer/native code might corrupt the results). Finally, you might want to check to be sure that new StackFrame(1) or .GetFrame(1) don't return null, as unlikely as that possibility might seem.

See this related question: Can you use reflection to find the name of the currently executing method?

How can I find the method that called the current method?

Related

Recent Posts