What happens in BeginProcessRequest()?

Solution 1:

What you might be seeing is commonly referred to as thread agility in .NET.

What you're probably seeing as far as the results underneath the topical label (i.e. Application code in System.Web.HttpApplication.BeginRequest()) is a thread agility problem; in most cases the time you see here isn't necessarily code being executed but the web context waiting for the threads to be released back to it from a reader-writer lock.

The Application_BeginRequest() "pause" is one that is pretty pervasive in a ASP.NET web stack. In general when you see long load times in BeginRequest, you are dealing with ASP.NET thread agility and/or thread locks - especially when dealing with IO and session based operations. Not that it's a bad thing, this is just how .net makes sure your threads remain concurrent.

The time gap generally occurs between BeginRequest and PreRequestHandlerExecute. If the application is writing several things to session then ASP.NET will issue a reader-writer lock on HttpContext.Current.Session.

A good way to see if this is an issue that you might be facing would be to check the thread IDs to see if agility is an issue - the IDs will be different for a given request.

For instance. While debugging, perhaps you could add the following to your Global.asax.cs:

protected void Application_BeginRequest(Object sender, EventArgs e) { 
      Debug.WriteLine("BeginRequest_" + Thread.CurrentThread.ManagedThreadId.ToString()); 
   }

Open up the debug output window (From Visual Studio: View >> Output, then select "Debug" from the "show output from" dropdown).

While debugging, hit a page where you have seen the long time. Then view the output log - if you see multiple id's then you might be suffering from this.

This is why you might see the delay sometimes but not other times, the application code might be using session a little differently or session or IO operations might be higher or lower from page to page.

If this is the case some things you can do to help speed things up depending on how session is used on the site or each given page.

For pages that do not modify session:

   <% @Page EnableSessionState="ReadOnly" %>

For pages that do not use session state:

<% @Page EnableSessionState="False" %>

If the app does not use session (web.config):

<configuration>
    <system.web>
      <sessionState mode="Off" />
    </system.web>
</configuration>

So let's take the following example:

User loads a page, then decides to go to another page before the first request is done loading ASP.NET will force a session lock causing the new page request load to wait until the first page request finishes. With ASP.NET MVC each action locks the user session for synchronization; causing the same issue.

All of the time it took for the lock to be release will be reported via new relic, not to mention the ones where the user abandoned the session and the thread coming back is looking for a user who no longer exists.

Incidentally the UpdatePanel control causes the same behavior -

http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/cc163413.aspx

What can be done:

This locking problem is one of the reasons Microsoft has the SessionStateUtility class -

http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.web.sessionstate.sessionstateutility.aspx

So that you can override the default behavior if you face this problem as seen here in this Redis implementation:https://github.com/angieslist/AL-Redis

There are many options to the default state provider used by .net based websites. But know generally this transaction time indicates that threads are being locked and waiting on requests to the server to be completed.

Solution 2:

If you want to enable a certain controller to process requests in parallel from a single user, you can use an attribute named SessionState that was introduced in MVC since version 3. It’s not necessary to use a session-less controller in order to achieve parallelism, the Ready-only option of the SessionStateBehavior will let you pass security checks you may have implemented based on Session data.

[SessionState(System.Web.SessionState.SessionStateBehavior.ReadOnly)]
[OutputCache(NoStore = true, Duration = 0, VaryByParam = "*")]
public class ParallelController : Controller
{
    ...
}

I also had delays in System.Web.Mvc.MvcHandler.BeginProcessRequest(), when try to do a few long running actions and I saw it in NewRelic. This attributes have solved problem and gave ability to handle actions parallel for this controller.

Solution 3:

I encountered this same problem in an app that had very minimal use of sessions. After taking the accepted answer into account, and even temporarily removing SessionState completely for diagnostic purposes, I still had significant issues with performance in this 'Method'

Based on todd_saylor's comment in this thread, I did a lot of research on my own site and found that BeginProcessRequest can be serve as New Relic's catch-all for miscellaneous performance losses that appear in different code areas. I was able to significantly reduce the time in this area, by profiling code on my local machine using Red Gate's ANTs Performance Profiler.

My local profiling revealed a few things:

1. I was using Ninject as my DI container, which caused performance loss in its Object resolution. I replaced it with SimpleInjector and increased performance by an order of magnitude.
2. I found that somewhere between AutoMapper's IQueryable Extensions Project().To<>() and the Linq's Sql Server provider, that the Dynamic Compiling and JITing of projections was responsible for 50% of my request time. Replacing that with CompiledQuerys made another significant dent.

Hope this helps someone else!