Shakespeare and Maths: Metre and Completeness
Shakespearian sonnets have a particular structure where each line of the poem contains ten syllables (due to the use of iambic pentameter). This is, one might think, because ten sounds 'complete' to some extent, like 4. For example
Love alters not with his brief hours and weeks
or
Which alters when its alteration finds
Is there any explanation in number theory to why the number 10 might seem complete to human minds and ears?
Or perhaps there is a mathematical explanation for why 10 is chosen for the number of syllables in the line?
Are there examples in nature where sets have a magnitude of 10 elements, or where the number 10 signifies some sort of totality, whether in a cycle or other abstract setting?
The reason why iambic pentameter is common among Shakespeare and other English poets has nothing to do with the intrinsic properties of the number 10, but rather the properties of the English language. Given the number of syllables and emphasis of English words, iambic pentameter is a meter that's easy to put English words into. The Greeks and the Romans were more inclined to use other meters. The Greeks primarily used dactylic hexameter, because that was most convenient for the pattern of long and short syllables of Greek words. The Romans used dactylic hexameter as well in their epic poetry, not because the length of each syllable in Latin words were particularly suited to it, but just because they were imitating Greek poetry. A more natural meter for Latin is the hendecasyllabic meter, used in Latin love poetry.
In any case, when the English started writing poetry, they tried to write it in dactylic hexameter, but they found it too difficult and awkward to squeeze English words into the meter, so they switched over to iambic pentameter. (And they also switched what they based the poetic meter on from how long a syllable is to what syllable is emphasized, because the length of a syllable is less useful a concept in English.) It had nothing to do with a recognition of how "complete" 10 was.
The most immediate hypothesis originates from our elementary abaci, the digits on our hands. The familiarity of the number perhaps is why our minds gravitated toward it in creating our decimal system.