visibility:hidden vs display:none vs opacity:0
While all 3 properties make an element's box seem invisible, there are crucial differences between them:
Property | Painted | In layout | Stacking context | Pointer events | Keyboard events |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
opacity: 0; |
No | Yes | New | Yes | Yes |
visibility: hidden; |
No | Yes | Varies | No | No |
display: none; |
No | No | Varies | No | No |
- The "Painted" column indicates if the browser will paint the element's background (e.g.
background-image
),#text
content, and so on.- An element cannot be painted without also participating in the page's layout, of course.
- This is No for all 3 properties and values, as the browser won't need to paint the element's box as it's invisible.
- The "In layout" column indicates if the browser will compute the layout and dimensions of the element - along with any of its descendants not excluded from layout.
- This is only No for
display: none;
, as withopacity: 0;
andvisibility: hidden;
the browser will still determine the size of the element so it can correctly layout other elements relative to the current element (e.g. if you havespan.hidden { visibility: hidden; display: inline; }
).
- This is only No for
- The "Stacking context" column indicates that any use of
opacity
(exceptopacity: 1.0;
) will create a new stacking-context, which complicates use of theposition
property. - The "Pointer events" column indicates if the element will respond to user-interaction from a pointing device, such as a mouse, touch-screen, stylus, etc.
- e.g. with
visibility: hidden;
then the:hover
state won't work, and clicking the same element won't apply:focus
or:active
either. - Additionally, the DOM won't raise any pointer events you'd handle in JavaScript (e.g.
visibility: hidden;
won't raisemouseclick
,touchstart
, etc - note that theclick
event can still be raised by certain elements, like<button>
if invoked by the user using a non-pointer input method, such as with keyboard or voice (accessible) navigation means.- You can use
pointer-events: none;
to block pointer events, but this won't block keyboard and other non-pointer input and so should not be used to disable an element because the user can still use the keyboard to interact with it (especially<button>
,<input />
,<select>
, and<textarea>
).
- You can use
- e.g. with
- The "Keyboard events" column indicates if the element can be interacted-with using keyboard navigation (and possibly other navigation means).
- This includes smart-device (smartphones' and tablets') browsers' "Prev/Next Field" buttons for navigating
<form>
elements (as this usestabindex
). - Unlike how pointer-events can be disabled in CSS using
pointer-events: none;
, there is no CSS property to disable keyboard interaction.
- This includes smart-device (smartphones' and tablets') browsers' "Prev/Next Field" buttons for navigating
This table shows a more complete comparison between the main values of those 3 properties:
Property | Painted | In layout | Stacking context | Pointer events | Keyboard events | Animatable |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Opacity | ||||||
opacity: 0; |
No | Yes | New | Yes | Yes | Yes |
opacity: 0.1; |
Yes | Yes | New | Yes | Yes | Yes |
opacity: 0.9; |
Yes | Yes | New | Yes | Yes | Yes |
opacity: 1; |
Yes | Yes | Varies | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Visibility | ||||||
visibility: hidden; |
No | Yes | Varies | No | No | Yes, with caveats |
visibility: visible; |
Yes | Yes | Varies | Yes | Yes | Yes, with caveats |
Display | ||||||
display: none; |
No | No | Varies | No | No | No |
display: contents; |
Text and children only | Text and children only | Varies | Yes | Yes | No |
Other | ||||||
pointer-events: none; |
N/A | N/A | N/A | No | Yes | No |
-
The "Animatable" column indicates if that property can be used with a CSS transition (
transition:
) or CSS animation (@keyframes
).- Crucially, the
display:
property cannot be animated, which is why we can't use a@keyframes
timeline to completely hide an element after the animation is complete.- But curiously, we can animate the
visibility:
property despite being non-continuous, albeit with caveats.
- But curiously, we can animate the
- Crucially, the
-
Also, don't get confused by the similarly-named
backface-visibility
andcontent-visibility
properties.-
backface-visibility
is only applicable to 3Dtransform
operations. -
content-visibility
is an optimization to speed-up page rendering during initial page-load, but requires CSS Containment first, which is out-of-scope for this QA.
-
The answer found here will answer your first question (most likely display:none
as the space is collapsed completely).
To your second question, tools such as this will probably be useful for you. However 40,000 divs sounds like way too many and you will probably have better performance using canvas or SVG (for example, using the KineticJS library as this handles animations - transformation, rotation, scale, etc.) for you.
Performance will be an issue if display:none or visibility:hidden is used since they trigger paint and layout in most browsers which means your browser will redraw the viewport whenever those two changes so I will recommend opacity but still for that number of divs it will still be not performant as expected you can try webgl using a library called html-gl which render your divs in webgl check https://github.com/PixelsCommander/HTML-GL
Here is a compilation of verified information from the various answers.
Each of these CSS properties is in fact unique. In addition to rendering an element not visible, they have the following additional effect(s):
- Collapses the space that the element would normally occupy
- Responds to events (e.g., click, keypress)
- Participates in the taborder
collapse events taborder opacity: 0 No Yes Yes visibility: hidden No No No visibility: collapse * No No display: none Yes No No * Yes inside a table element, otherwise No.
got from link