Math Subject GRE 1268 Question 55
If $a$ and $b$ are positive numbers, what is the value of $\displaystyle \int_0^\infty \frac{e^{ax}-e^{bx}}{(1+e^{ax})(1+e^{bx})}dx$.
A: $0$
B: $1$
C: $a-b$
D: $(a-b)\log 2$
E: $\frac{a-b}{ab}\log 2$
I really don't see how to start this one, I'm not so great with integrals.
One indirect approach:
Write
$$f(a,b) = \int_0^\infty \frac{e^{ax}-e^{bx}}{(1+e^{ax})(1+e^{bx})}dx$$
Then changing variables by $x = ku$, for some positive $k$,
$$f(a,b) = k \int_0^\infty \frac{e^{kau}-e^{kbu}}{(1+e^{kau})(1+e^{kbu})}du = k\, f(ka,kb) $$
The only$^*$ answer which obeys the relation $$f(a,b) = k \,f(ka,kb)$$ is Option E.
$^*$Footnote: As pointed out in the comments, Option A does follow this relation as well but is easy to rule out on other grounds.
To unpack my original thinking:
- Option A is not possible as we can make the integrand positive: for $a > b$, $f(a,b) > 0$
- Option B is not possible as $f(a,b)$ cannot be independent of $a$ and $b$, e.g., without explicitly calculating, it looks clear that $\partial_a f(a,b) \neq 0$.
- Now we're down to Options C, D or E. Since this is a question from a timed test and mathematicians are ruthlessly efficient (aka lazy), I don't want to evaluate the integral. Instead, can I find quickly some sort of scaling argument to rule out Options C and D? My 'fear' is that $f(ka,kb) = k\,f(a,b)$ which will instead rule out Option E and then I'll be stuck having to calculate the integral in order to differentiate between C and D.
- But no! Instead $f(a,b) = k\,f(ka,kb)$. Good!
The integral being considered is, and is evaluated as, the following. \begin{align} I &= \int_{0}^{\infty} \frac{e^{ax}-e^{bx}}{(1+e^{ax})(1+e^{bx})}dx \\ &= \int_{0}^{\infty} \frac{dx}{1 + e^{bx}} - \int_{0}^{\infty} \frac{dx}{1 + e^{ax}} \\ &= \left( \frac{1}{b} - \frac{1}{a} \right) \, \int_{1}^{\infty} \frac{dt}{t(1+t)} \mbox{ where $t = e^{bx}$ in the first and $t = e^{ax}$ in the second integral } \\ &= \left( \frac{1}{b} - \frac{1}{a}\right) \, \lim_{p \to \infty} \, \int_{1}^{p} \left( \frac{1}{t} - \frac{1}{1+t} \right) \, dt \\ &= \left( \frac{1}{b} - \frac{1}{a}\right) \, \lim_{p \to \infty} \, \left[ \ln(t) - \ln(1+t) \right]_{1}^{p} \\ &= \left( \frac{1}{b} - \frac{1}{a}\right) \, \lim_{p \to \infty} \left[ \ln\left( \frac{p}{1 + p}\right) + \ln 2 \right] \\ &= \left( \frac{1}{b} - \frac{1}{a}\right) \, \lim_{p \to \infty} \left[ \ln\left( \frac{1}{1 + \frac{1}{p}}\right) + \ln 2 \right] \\ &= \left( \frac{1}{b} - \frac{1}{a} \right) \, \ln 2 \end{align}
Note: Originally the statement "This is valid if $a \neq b$" was given at the end of the solution. Upon reflection it is believed that the statement should have been "This is valid for $a,b \neq 0$".