How can I find the last element in a List<>?
The following is an extract from my code:
public class AllIntegerIDs
{
public AllIntegerIDs()
{
m_MessageID = 0;
m_MessageType = 0;
m_ClassID = 0;
m_CategoryID = 0;
m_MessageText = null;
}
~AllIntegerIDs()
{
}
public void SetIntegerValues (int messageID, int messagetype,
int classID, int categoryID)
{
this.m_MessageID = messageID;
this.m_MessageType = messagetype;
this.m_ClassID = classID;
this.m_CategoryID = categoryID;
}
public string m_MessageText;
public int m_MessageID;
public int m_MessageType;
public int m_ClassID;
public int m_CategoryID;
}
I am trying to use the following in my main()
function code:
List<AllIntegerIDs> integerList = new List<AllIntegerIDs>();
/* some code here that is ised for following assignments*/
{
integerList.Add(new AllIntegerIDs());
index++;
integerList[index].m_MessageID = (int)IntegerIDsSubstring[IntOffset];
integerList[index].m_MessageType = (int)IntegerIDsSubstring[IntOffset + 1];
integerList[index].m_ClassID = (int)IntegerIDsSubstring[IntOffset + 2];
integerList[index].m_CategoryID = (int)IntegerIDsSubstring[IntOffset + 3];
integerList[index].m_MessageText = MessageTextSubstring;
}
Problem is here: I am trying to print all elements in my List using a for loop:
for (int cnt3 = 0 ; cnt3 <= integerList.FindLastIndex ; cnt3++) //<----PROBLEM HERE
{
Console.WriteLine("{0}\t{1}\t{2}\t{3}\t{4}\n", integerList[cnt3].m_MessageID,integerList[cnt3].m_MessageType,integerList[cnt3].m_ClassID,integerList[cnt3].m_CategoryID, integerList[cnt3].m_MessageText);
}
I want to find the last element so that I equate cnt3 in my for loop and print out all entries in the List
. Each element in the list is an object of the class AllIntegerIDs
as mentioned above in the code sample. How do I find the last valid entry in the List?
Should I use something like integerList.Find(integerList[].m_MessageText == null;
?
If I use that it will need an index that will range from 0 to whatever maximum. Means I will have to use another for loop which I do not intend to use. Is there a shorter/better way?
Solution 1:
To get the last item of a collection use LastOrDefault() and Last() extension methods
var lastItem = integerList.LastOrDefault();
OR
var lastItem = integerList.Last();
Remeber to add using System.Linq;
, or this method won't be available.
Solution 2:
If you just want to access the last item in the list you can do
if(integerList.Count>0)
{
// pre C#8.0 : var item = integerList[integerList.Count - 1];
// C#8.0 :
var item = integerList[^1];
}
to get the total number of items in the list you can use the Count
property
var itemCount = integerList.Count;
Solution 3:
In C# 8.0 you can get the last item with ^ operator full explanation
List<char> list = ...;
var value = list[^1];
// Gets translated to
var value = list[list.Count - 1];
Solution 4:
Lets get at the root of the question, how to address the last element of a List safely...
Assuming
List<string> myList = new List<string>();
Then
//NOT safe on an empty list!
string myString = myList[myList.Count -1];
//equivalent to the above line when Count is 0, bad index
string otherString = myList[-1];
"count-1" is a bad habit unless you first guarantee the list is not empty.
There is not a convenient way around checking for the empty list except to do it.
The shortest way I can think of is
string myString = (myList.Count != 0) ? myList [ myList.Count-1 ] : "";
you could go all out and make a delegate that always returns true, and pass it to FindLast, which will return the last value (or default constructed valye if the list is empty). This function starts at the end of the list so will be Big O(1) or constant time, despite the method normally being O(n).
//somewhere in your codebase, a strange delegate is defined
private static bool alwaysTrue(string in)
{
return true;
}
//Wherever you are working with the list
string myString = myList.FindLast(alwaysTrue);
The FindLast method is ugly if you count the delegate part, but it only needs to be declared one place. If the list is empty, it will return a default constructed value of the list type "" for string. Taking the alwaysTrue delegate a step further, making it a template instead of string type, would be more useful.