Break or exit out of "with" statement?
I'd just like to exit out of a with
statement under certain conditions:
with open(path) as f:
print 'before condition'
if <condition>: break #syntax error!
print 'after condition'
Of course, the above doesn't work. Is there a way to do this? (I know that I can invert the condition: if not <condition>: print 'after condition'
-- any way that is like above?)
Solution 1:
with
giving you trouble? Throw more with
-able objects at the problem!
class fragile(object):
class Break(Exception):
"""Break out of the with statement"""
def __init__(self, value):
self.value = value
def __enter__(self):
return self.value.__enter__()
def __exit__(self, etype, value, traceback):
error = self.value.__exit__(etype, value, traceback)
if etype == self.Break:
return True
return error
Just wrap the expression you're going to with
with fragile
, and raise fragile.Break
to break out at any point!
with fragile(open(path)) as f:
print 'before condition'
if condition:
raise fragile.Break
print 'after condition'
Benefits of this setup
- Uses
with
and just thewith
; doesn't wrap your function in a semantically misleading one-run 'loop' or a narrowly specialized function, and doesn't force you to do any extra error handling after thewith
. - Keeps your local variables available, instead of having to pass them to a wrapping function.
-
Nestable!
with fragile(open(path1)) as f: with fragile(open(path2)) as g: print f.read() print g.read() raise fragile.Break print "This wont happen" print "This will though!"
This way, you don't have to create a new function to wrap the outer
with
if you want both to break. - Doesn't require restructuring at all: just wrap what you already have with
fragile
and you're good to go!
Downsides of this setup
- Doesn't actually use a 'break' statement. Can't win em all ;)
Solution 2:
The best way would be to encapsulate it in a function and use return
:
def do_it():
with open(path) as f:
print 'before condition'
if <condition>:
return
print 'after condition'
Solution 3:
This is an ancient question, but this is an application for the handy "breakable scope" idiom. Just imbed your with
statement inside:
for _ in (True,):
with open(path) as f:
print 'before condition'
if <condition>: break
print 'after condition'
This idiom creates a "loop", always executed exactly once, for the sole purpose of enclosing a block of code inside a scope that can be broken out of conditionally. In OP's case, it was a context manager invocation to be enclosed, but it could be any bounded sequence of statements that may require conditional escape.
The accepted answer is fine, but this technique does the same thing without needing to create a function, which is not always convenient or desired.