How can I convert seconds since the epoch to hours/minutes/seconds in Java?
Is there a fast, low-garbage way to do it? I can't just do simple modulus arithmetic since that doesn't account for leap seconds and other date/time funny business.
I've figured out how to deal with leap years in integer arithmetic and implemented a converter from seconds since Epoch to date/time (it never gives you more than 59 seconds, though). The below C code should be very easy to port to Java.
#include <string.h>
#include <time.h>
typedef unsigned uint;
typedef unsigned long long uint64;
struct tm* SecondsSinceEpochToDateTime(struct tm* pTm, uint64 SecondsSinceEpoch)
{
uint64 sec;
uint quadricentennials, centennials, quadrennials, annuals/*1-ennial?*/;
uint year, leap;
uint yday, hour, min;
uint month, mday, wday;
static const uint daysSinceJan1st[2][13]=
{
{0,31,59,90,120,151,181,212,243,273,304,334,365}, // 365 days, non-leap
{0,31,60,91,121,152,182,213,244,274,305,335,366} // 366 days, leap
};
/*
400 years:
1st hundred, starting immediately after a leap year that's a multiple of 400:
n n n l \
n n n l } 24 times
... /
n n n l /
n n n n
2nd hundred:
n n n l \
n n n l } 24 times
... /
n n n l /
n n n n
3rd hundred:
n n n l \
n n n l } 24 times
... /
n n n l /
n n n n
4th hundred:
n n n l \
n n n l } 24 times
... /
n n n l /
n n n L <- 97'th leap year every 400 years
*/
// Re-bias from 1970 to 1601:
// 1970 - 1601 = 369 = 3*100 + 17*4 + 1 years (incl. 89 leap days) =
// (3*100*(365+24/100) + 17*4*(365+1/4) + 1*365)*24*3600 seconds
sec = SecondsSinceEpoch + 11644473600LL;
wday = (uint)((sec / 86400 + 1) % 7); // day of week
// Remove multiples of 400 years (incl. 97 leap days)
quadricentennials = (uint)(sec / 12622780800ULL); // 400*365.2425*24*3600
sec %= 12622780800ULL;
// Remove multiples of 100 years (incl. 24 leap days), can't be more than 3
// (because multiples of 4*100=400 years (incl. leap days) have been removed)
centennials = (uint)(sec / 3155673600ULL); // 100*(365+24/100)*24*3600
if (centennials > 3)
{
centennials = 3;
}
sec -= centennials * 3155673600ULL;
// Remove multiples of 4 years (incl. 1 leap day), can't be more than 24
// (because multiples of 25*4=100 years (incl. leap days) have been removed)
quadrennials = (uint)(sec / 126230400); // 4*(365+1/4)*24*3600
if (quadrennials > 24)
{
quadrennials = 24;
}
sec -= quadrennials * 126230400ULL;
// Remove multiples of years (incl. 0 leap days), can't be more than 3
// (because multiples of 4 years (incl. leap days) have been removed)
annuals = (uint)(sec / 31536000); // 365*24*3600
if (annuals > 3)
{
annuals = 3;
}
sec -= annuals * 31536000ULL;
// Calculate the year and find out if it's leap
year = 1601 + quadricentennials * 400 + centennials * 100 + quadrennials * 4 + annuals;
leap = !(year % 4) && (year % 100 || !(year % 400));
// Calculate the day of the year and the time
yday = sec / 86400;
sec %= 86400;
hour = sec / 3600;
sec %= 3600;
min = sec / 60;
sec %= 60;
// Calculate the month
for (mday = month = 1; month < 13; month++)
{
if (yday < daysSinceJan1st[leap][month])
{
mday += yday - daysSinceJan1st[leap][month - 1];
break;
}
}
// Fill in C's "struct tm"
memset(pTm, 0, sizeof(*pTm));
pTm->tm_sec = sec; // [0,59]
pTm->tm_min = min; // [0,59]
pTm->tm_hour = hour; // [0,23]
pTm->tm_mday = mday; // [1,31] (day of month)
pTm->tm_mon = month - 1; // [0,11] (month)
pTm->tm_year = year - 1900; // 70+ (year since 1900)
pTm->tm_wday = wday; // [0,6] (day since Sunday AKA day of week)
pTm->tm_yday = yday; // [0,365] (day since January 1st AKA day of year)
pTm->tm_isdst = -1; // daylight saving time flag
return pTm;
}
See a test run at ideone.
I can't just do simple modulus arithmetic since that doesn't account for leap seconds and other date/time funny business.
Java doesn't account for leap seconds in general - or rather, officially that's up to the platform, but I don't believe it's implemented in any of the common production platforms. Are you sure you need to account for leap seconds? If you do, you should be able to do a simple table-based lookup of the number of seconds to add or remove, depending on what your data source is and what you want it to reflect.
As for "other date/time funny business" - I don't think there is any funny business for this particular calculation. Time zones are irrelevant in terms of elapsed time since the epoch, for example.