Why do pythonistas call the current reference "self" and not "this"?
Solution 1:
Smalltalk-80, released by Xerox in 1980, used self
. Objective-C (early 1980s) layers Smalltalk features over C, so it uses self
too. Modula-3 (1988), Python (late 1980s), and Ruby (mid 1990s) also follow this tradition.
C++, also dating from the early 1980s, chose this
instead of self
. Since Java was designed to be familiar to C/C++ developers, it uses this
too.
Smalltalk uses the metaphor of objects sending messages to each other, so "self" just indicates that the object is sending a message to itself.
Solution 2:
Check the history of Python for user defined classes:
Instead, one simply defines a function whose first argument corresponds to the instance, which by convention is named "self." For example:
def spam(self,y):
print self.x, y
This approach resembles something I had seen in Modula-3, which had already provided me with the syntax for import and exception handling.
It's a choice as good as any other. You might ask why C++, Java, and C# chose "this" just as easily.
Solution 3:
Smalltalk, which predates Java of course.
Solution 4:
With respect to python, there is nothing special about self
. You can use this
instead if you wanted:
Here's an example:
>>> class A(object):
... def __init__(this):
... this.x = 3
...
>>> a = A()
>>> a.x
3
Although you could name it whatever you want, self
is the convention for the first argument of a class function. Check out paragraph 5 of section 9.4 in the python documentation, which says:
Often, the first argument of a method is called self. This is nothing more than a convention: the name self has absolutely no special meaning to Python. Note, however, that by not following the convention your code may be less readable to other Python programmers, and it is also conceivable that a class browser program might be written that relies upon such a convention.
As for the convention, it started out in Smalltalk, but is also used in Object Pascal, Python, Ruby, and Objective-C. This answer has a great explanation.