Are ZFS snapshots really "free"?
Solution 1:
I did a test, actually for an un-related problem (zfs send
being unable to send a filesystem with over 42,000 snapshots) and to my surprise, I discovered that zfs snapshots actually consume a handful of megabytes. In my tests, this was about 4 MiB/snapshot.
To test this, I created an empty zpool with a single filesystem with no files, directories, or other data at all. I then attempted to create 100,000 snapshots and to my surprise, this faied after creating only 50,698 snapshots:
root@test:~# zpool create tank nvme-nvme.15ad-564d57617265204e564d455f30303030-564d77617265205669727475616c204e564d65204469736b-00000002
root@test:~# zpool list
NAME SIZE ALLOC FREE CKPOINT EXPANDSZ FRAG CAP DEDUP HEALTH ALTROOT
tank 199G 116K 199G - - 0% 0% 1.00x ONLINE -
root@test:~# zfs create tank/test
root@test:~# zfs list
NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT
tank 118K 193G 24K /tank
tank/test 24K 193G 24K /tank/test
root@test:~# ls -lR /tank/
/tank/:
total 1
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 2 Mar 14 15:16 test
/tank/test:
total 0
root@test:~# find /tank
/tank
/tank/test
root@test:~# for i in {0..100000}; do zfs snapshot tank/test@snap$i; done
cannot create snapshots : out of space
cannot create snapshots : out of space
...
cannot create snapshots : out of space
cannot create snapshots : out of space
root@proxmoxtest:~# zfs list -t snapshot | wc -l
50698
root@proxmoxtest:~# zpool list
NAME SIZE ALLOC FREE CKPOINT EXPANDSZ FRAG CAP DEDUP HEALTH ALTROOT
tank 200G 193G 6.23G - - 84% 96% 1.00x ONLINE -
Based on this test, it seems that ZFS needs about 3.9 MiB of space for storing metadata for each snapshot on a 200GiB zpool. This appears to vary by pool size; when I tested with a 20GiB zpool, it came out to ~1.8 MiB/snapshot.
So while zfs snapshots may use a "negligible' amount of space (definition of "negligible" may be opinion-based) that cost is not zero; there is a small space overhead (measurable in megabytes) for each snapshot, even when no blocks change.