Best TCP port number range for internal applications [closed]

I decided to download the assigned port numbers from IANA, filter out the used ports, and sort each "Unassigned" range in order of most ports available, descending. This did not work, since the csv file has ranges marked as "Unassigned" that overlap other port number reservations. I manually expanded the ranges of assigned port numbers, leaving me with a list of all assigned port numbers. I then sorted that list and generated my own list of unassigned ranges.

Since this stackoverflow.com page ranked very high in my search about the topic, I figured I'd post the largest ranges here for anyone else who is interested. These are for both TCP and UDP where the number of ports in the range is at least 500.

Total   Start   End
829     29170   29998
815     38866   39680
710     41798   42507
681     43442   44122
661     46337   46997
643     35358   36000
609     36866   37474
596     38204   38799
592     33657   34248
571     30261   30831
563     41231   41793
542     21011   21552
528     28590   29117
521     14415   14935
510     26490   26999

Source (via the CSV download button):

http://www.iana.org/assignments/service-names-port-numbers/service-names-port-numbers.xhtml

I can't see why you would care. Other than the "don't use ports below 1024" privilege rule, you should be able to use any port because your clients should be configurable to talk to any IP address and port!

If they're not, then they haven't been done very well. Go back and do them properly :-)

In other words, run the server at IP address X and port Y then configure clients with that information. Then, if you find you must run a different server on X that conflicts with your Y, just re-configure your server and clients to use a new port. This is true whether your clients are code, or people typing URLs into a browser.

I, like you, wouldn't try to get numbers assigned by IANA since that's supposed to be for services so common that many, many environments will use them (think SSH or FTP or TELNET).

Your network is your network and, if you want your servers on port 1234 (or even the TELNET or FTP ports for that matter), that's your business. Case in point, in our mainframe development area, port 23 is used for the 3270 terminal server which is a vastly different beast to telnet. If you want to telnet to the UNIX side of the mainframe, you use port 1023. That's sometimes annoying if you use telnet clients without specifying port 1023 since it hooks you up to a server that knows nothing of the telnet protocol - we have to break out of the telnet client and do it properly:

telnet big_honking_mainframe_box.com 1023

If you really can't make the client side configurable, pick one in the second range, like 48042, and just use it, declaring that any other software on those boxes (including any added in the future) has to keep out of your way.

Short answer: use an unassigned user port

Over achiever's answer - Select and deploy a resource discovery solution. Have the server select a private port dynamically. Have the clients use resource discovery.

The risk that that a server will fail because the port it wants to listen on is not available is real; at least it's happened to me. Another service or a client might get there first.

You can almost totally reduce the risk from a client by avoiding the private ports, which are dynamically handed out to clients.

The risk that from another service is minimal if you use a user port. An unassigned port's risk is only that another service happens to be configured (or dyamically) uses that port. But at least that's probably under your control.

The huge doc with all the port assignments, including User Ports, is here: http://www.iana.org/assignments/service-names-port-numbers/service-names-port-numbers.txt look for the token Unassigned.